Then I’ll get the second error: No TPM found or no compatible BIOS, even when I have a TPM 1.2 chip. Ok I know I should create two partitions…. Tried with BitLocker and had the first error message saying that the drive is not ready for it. It the best (worse case?) you can use AES, Twofish AND serpent together… as result you have a 256*3=768bit encryption. You can even choose many algortims (or combination of them). Using TC you can also create single encrypted files, or single partitions (with the option of hidden other partitions in it, for ultra high security). Ok for the moment I’m only using it for private reasons and for the laptop I use for business. It’s the main reason for me! it! It’s so flexible and adapts to every situation. But big enterprises probably will go for Bitlocker.Īnother big feature of TrueCrypt is that there also is a linux version (from v5 also the GUI). As long as you have to do this for one or two computers only, it is not big a deal.
#Bitlocker vs truecrypt password
Of course, you can save the password manually on a safe place with TrueCrypt, too. (Please also read the comments below about this topic) Bitlocker allows you to store the recovery password on one or more USB devices and it is even possible to store recovery information in Active Directory. However, without the correct password, you won't get very far.
#Bitlocker vs truecrypt iso
TrueCrypt creates an ISO file for a Rescue disc during the configuration process, but this CD will only be of help if the TrueCrypt boot loader was damaged or if you want to decrypt your system drive. If you lose your TrueCrypt password, you'll be lost, too. TrueCrypt doesn't support TPM.īitlocker has other features that TrueCrypt lacks. you don't need a pre-boot PIN or a USB device with the start-up key. And if your computer has a TPM chip (Trusted Platform Module), you can logon to Vista as usual, i.e. Instead of entering the so-called pre-boot PIN you can also insert a USB device that contains the start-up key.
Bitlocker works similarly, but has more options to offer here. Before the OS is loaded you have to enter your TrueCrypt password. However, when you boot-up the next time, you will make out the difference. That is, encryption and decryption works in the background and you shouldn't realize any performance loss. Actually, there is no other way for TrueCrypt, anyway.Īfter TrueCrypt has encrypted your system drive, you won't realize any difference at first. TrueCrypt, on the other hand, allows you to encrypt your system drive without hassle after you installed the OS. If you installed Vista without configuring it first for Bitlocker you already have a problem. The fact that Bitlocker requires two partitions illustrates this. The installations process is certainly more complex. It is highly recommended to read the Bitlocker documentation first in order to understand all its options. When I tested this feature, I didn't need any documentation. A wizard guides you to a process offering detailed information for every step.
#Bitlocker vs truecrypt windows
TrueCrypt 5 is another option and it not only works on every Vista edition it also supports Windows XP/2000/2003.Įncrypting a system partition with Truecrypt 5 is super simple. Vista's Bitlocker is a solution to this problem provided you have Vista Enterprise or Ultimate. This applies especially to laptops and computers in public places. Encrypting the hard disk makes sense on any computer that is prone to getting into the wrong hands.
0 kommentar(er)
